{"id":"W2098370826","doi":"10.29173/cmplct8726","title":"The Potential of Reflective Journals in Studying Complexity 'In Action'","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Complicity An International Journal of Complexity and Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disequilibrium; Action (physics); Scope (computer science); Documentation; Reflective practice; Reflection (computer programming); Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Action research; Engineering ethics; Data science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003504533,0.0001045744,0.0002403244,0.0004600229,0.0001832362,0.00008113608,0.0004228572,0.00005763022,0.0001315918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002659175,0.00008809719,0.00006260485,0.0002239685,0.0002581058,0.0003890521,0.00004342148,0.0007031627,0.000002548767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002112741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001322981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005363267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004671237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974012,0.00122199,0.0007544685,0.0001397002,0.0003249634,0.0001576839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981002,0.0002850375,0.0007381892,0.0001306686,0.0006925566,0.00005333054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002206938,0.003960863,0.1897745,0.00001943734,0.0003171027,0.000007686381,0.02393638,0.001484274,0.00970026,0.2830023,0.0005571252,0.4850332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006865183,0.0001441737,0.9509002,0.00008250723,0.000007522797,0.0001530197,0.004357141,0.0004905617,0.0001561291,0.04143324,0.00150703,0.0000819428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856839,0.0002466689,0.007716924,0.00263141,0.001294589,0.00009234845,0.000003478232,0.0000054093,0.00232529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991551,0.00005229344,0.00743561,0.0002050351,0.0006285367,0.000003483373,0.000004539687,0.000007095396,0.0001123434],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7611257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3592499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2945444638302384,"score_gpt":0.518692091175105,"score_spread":0.2241476273448666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}