{"id":"W2098375030","doi":"10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0184:iviasf]2.0.co;2","title":"INDIVIDUAL VARIATION IN ATLANTIC SALMON FERTILIZATION SUCCESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fish migration; Human fertilization; Biology; Reproductive success; Salmo; Population; Ecology; Reproduction; Mating; Zoology; Fishery; Demography; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002201817,0.0001102525,0.0001380704,0.00004368729,0.0003675396,0.0000220193,0.0001807438,0.0001157919,0.001182389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002273915,0.0001037333,0.00003814417,0.0004428048,0.00007072612,0.000177137,0.000116252,0.00007807324,0.0002365407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001830876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001188682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006720585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002033446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990175,0.00005865236,0.0002515092,0.0003710365,0.00007771818,0.0002236202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990866,0.000589419,0.0001082335,0.0001659819,0.00001311605,0.00003667812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007202231,0.0005108824,0.9809294,0.000008771406,0.00001351261,1.228394e-7,0.0001028037,0.001124408,0.0001202861,0.009308642,0.004499035,0.003374896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003230189,0.00006697066,0.9758118,0.000001579292,0.00003011673,4.78203e-7,0.000009751532,0.001500631,0.000003939181,0.01915917,0.002977927,0.0001145735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469837,0.00001742511,0.02808241,0.00878403,0.00006942424,0.005704085,0.00003319557,0.0001931693,0.01013257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898199,0.00002699087,0.001738134,0.000560977,0.00003175104,0.007526951,0.00009681035,0.000007489447,0.000191004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0428362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01584760883207081,"score_gpt":0.2473932824147173,"score_spread":0.2315456735826465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}