{"id":"W2098431054","doi":"10.1111/j.1556-4029.2005.00030.x","title":"The RECON Typology of Stalking: Reliability and Validity Based Upon a Large Sample of North American Stalkers","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Sciences","topic":"Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":239,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Barrie Urology Group","funders":"","keywords":"Stalking; Typology; Psychology; Discriminant validity; Context (archaeology); Poison control; Criminology; Inter-rater reliability; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Sociology; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Environmental health; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004636568,0.0001043044,0.0003421586,0.0001448375,0.0006663371,0.00005458733,0.0003596191,0.00003346649,0.00002312678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00114796,0.00006815041,0.0001389784,0.0005942626,0.003744643,0.0002058015,0.00004238385,0.0001317102,1.774272e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001011015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005932695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008827355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04187281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976979,0.0003439554,0.0006028427,0.0001782355,0.0008096662,0.0003674302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965192,0.001503043,0.001389824,0.0001429748,0.0003553292,0.00008960012],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487442,0.0001867464,0.958764,0.00001872474,0.0000306711,0.000003865567,0.003464237,0.0002284575,0.0001382631,0.01498486,0.0009211467,0.02111034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007589225,0.001971727,0.9392493,0.00005607404,0.00007897058,0.000007464335,0.01577599,0.0003905125,0.001265672,0.01725717,0.0229717,0.0002164417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957882,0.0001191691,0.0003858807,0.0009588072,0.0004334876,0.00009440317,0.00002472303,0.00000636395,0.002188927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967275,0.0001210166,0.002973901,0.0000393058,0.0001106964,9.378757e-7,7.435293e-7,0.000003862464,0.00002205998],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03304545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03161395574377298,"score_gpt":0.315651359155099,"score_spread":0.2840374034113261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}