{"id":"W2098621703","doi":"","title":"METHODS FOR IMAGE FUSION QUALITY ASSESSMENT - A REVIEW, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Advanced Image Fusion Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assessment; Image fusion; Image quality; Ranking (information retrieval); Standard deviation; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Fusion; Sensor fusion; Quality (philosophy); Correlation coefficient; Statistics; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics; Image (mathematics); Evaluation methods; Reliability engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006130024,0.0001206619,0.000449003,0.00009674064,0.00007134665,0.000009078208,0.00007272848,0.00003611142,0.0001708508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000948956,0.0001040801,0.0001136009,0.0003247475,0.00003223243,0.0001267165,0.00004566214,0.0000868058,0.000001346065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000407749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005737957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001282768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004189104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991681,0.00008088209,0.000355685,0.0001729972,0.00008751472,0.0001348408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993673,0.0001962636,0.00004902896,0.000261811,0.00006928391,0.00005632484],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001430054,0.0001379994,0.005443375,0.002454803,0.0005135908,0.000004560209,0.0002090635,0.0003090908,0.2962911,0.0008647118,0.0526202,0.6411372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008167399,0.0001575844,0.04380548,0.0002493744,0.0009991877,0.00001822473,0.0001094019,0.6484784,0.1967894,0.002152998,0.1052616,0.001161532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001278968,0.003967067,0.9900001,0.00007585858,0.00002387253,0.0003822829,0.000007419314,0.0005431984,0.003721284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00814974,0.007479872,0.9839004,0.0001416469,0.000009732952,0.00009981958,0.00002666029,0.00001545704,0.0001767189],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6481694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4244264,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06808736002439475,"score_gpt":0.4824693185722307,"score_spread":0.4143819585478359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}