{"id":"W2098644910","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07128.x","title":"Spatial scaling of species abundance distributions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; McGill University; Smithsonian Institution; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Relative abundance distribution; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Shrub; Relative species abundance; Macroecology; Species distribution; Biodiversity; Rank abundance curve; Spatial distribution; Species richness; Geography; Biology; Habitat; Remote sensing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007319828,0.0001277316,0.0001948735,0.00112555,0.0002378286,0.0005826726,0.0002127784,0.000219309,0.001123452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01010896,0.0001925779,0.0002042082,0.0006833382,0.0006554224,0.0007596097,0.0003249395,0.0002682206,0.0001408177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004054756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001288526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003130948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002294579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996434,0.0001220907,0.00001779858,0.0001085595,0.00007271318,0.00003544061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962275,0.00207686,0.0006127399,0.0005309897,0.0004542835,0.00009776408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000194211,0.00005542636,0.6786773,0.0001648156,0.0002052677,0.0006432622,0.001544083,0.1736463,0.03136161,0.02718885,0.001746315,0.08457249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001213533,0.00003491811,0.6359441,0.00002614777,0.00001694078,0.0006079791,0.0004356398,0.3393499,0.001711142,0.02012165,0.001698151,0.00004125112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743352,0.0002269332,0.02242433,0.0001386366,0.000006767386,0.00001127221,0.0001945616,0.0001129539,0.002549318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984587,0.00004139007,0.001299761,0.000006491733,0.000006082179,0.00000589735,0.00008056314,0.00001121415,0.00008985343],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003130948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006225467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01466873300994778,"score_gpt":0.2030479911378473,"score_spread":0.1883792581278995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}