{"id":"W2098720322","doi":"10.1029/2004jf000176","title":"Response of sand dunes to variations in tidal flow: Fraser Estuary, Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Geology; Sediment transport; Acoustic Doppler current profiler; Sediment; Bedform; Estuary; Geomorphology; Mean flow; Turbulence; Hydrology (agriculture); Erosion; Flow velocity; Flow (mathematics); Oceanography; Current (fluid); Meteorology; Geotechnical engineering; Geometry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001195457,0.00008952535,0.000223418,0.00002218719,0.00008800043,0.00001098555,0.0003587832,0.00005408646,0.002336398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005698809,0.000071752,0.00005076782,0.0005612099,0.0001718071,0.0002409761,0.0000718244,0.0004088145,0.00007413966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001502958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004417025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08693495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2981644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978626,0.0002581459,0.0003952607,0.000147882,0.0009810139,0.0003550596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987094,0.0007598266,0.00007753836,0.0001387533,0.00007746689,0.000236967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01223479,0.002497371,0.6731064,0.00005959151,0.0001452484,0.0006802144,0.002817686,0.1594849,0.06249026,0.0002502227,0.06253133,0.02370198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009183332,0.0008793774,0.9526532,0.00006418765,0.000009746735,0.000005300433,0.0001282813,0.001914004,0.0132855,0.0009623357,0.029045,0.0001347302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939961,0.00006332927,0.0001520004,0.004593485,0.00004030923,0.00009653087,0.000005211189,0.000002226532,0.001050765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969869,0.00001821352,0.002244753,0.0002024624,0.00009352534,0.00000451054,5.955865e-7,0.000007230362,0.0004417574],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2795468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01418100728284163,"score_gpt":0.284984323265316,"score_spread":0.2708033159824744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}