{"id":"W2098821679","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.012","title":"Preschoolers’ appreciation of speaker vocal affect as a cue to referential intent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Cancer Research UK","keywords":"Psychology; Referent; Affect (linguistics); Comprehension; Ambiguity; Intonation (linguistics); Gaze; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; Developmental psychology; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004068323,0.0002053745,0.0003735328,0.0003475415,0.00004908958,0.00001847459,0.0004032073,0.0002437904,0.006806166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009424011,0.0001734196,0.0002146044,0.0001849197,0.00008901132,0.000120382,0.00006871485,0.0006453192,0.0002735026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003242212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003777339,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004880004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003556101,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998279,0.0001257673,0.0006924749,0.000283683,0.0003124673,0.0003065959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998862,0.00005404729,0.0004402786,0.0003230615,0.0001093765,0.000211283],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01092633,0.007139576,0.02622887,0.00002456481,0.001376886,0.0002691133,0.06179524,0.000007622823,0.7161567,0.02231357,0.1237412,0.03002023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01550414,0.006947767,0.7580394,0.0001627362,0.0001494483,0.002799026,0.01628678,0.00000315261,0.1424627,0.0009473902,0.05569797,0.0009994272],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8883633,0.0005436107,0.0003249543,0.0007898937,0.00578197,0.0002521158,0.000003836878,0.0000142153,0.1039261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964727,0.00000816232,0.0009671602,0.001435632,0.0005966907,0.00001454509,0.000008631401,0.00002748576,0.0004690359],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7318106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01457910686163686,"score_gpt":0.370959807664415,"score_spread":0.3563807008027781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}