{"id":"W2098875879","doi":"10.1109/ecce.2011.6064190","title":"Design and analysis of Brushless Doubly Fed Reluctance Machines","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electric Motor Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Magnetic reluctance; Torque; Offset (computer science); Switched reluctance motor; Computer science; Power density; Power (physics); Reluctance motor; Torque density; Control engineering; Automotive engineering; Control theory (sociology); Engineering; Magnet; Electrical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006010257,0.0007705344,0.0008499249,0.0005681872,0.0003959068,0.001175641,0.0008625531,0.001038899,0.002862781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001046837,0.0005100386,0.0007363085,0.0003337201,0.0004735466,0.0005809576,0.0004497384,0.0004880092,0.0008797881],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005223403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006259102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001028803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009120439,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995955,0.00008267485,0.00001880091,0.00004595602,0.0002344069,0.00002270328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997496,0.00007898644,0.00006369506,0.00001796854,0.00007802297,0.00001178318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007794405,0.00004818595,0.0005381485,0.000530182,0.00004613925,0.0003200641,0.0002052513,0.8542678,0.02987946,0.04789829,0.001491786,0.06469676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001125889,0.00007687193,0.0002280157,0.00002224379,0.00001151478,0.00007939618,0.00002232504,0.985493,0.001790211,0.005978009,0.006276241,0.00001088476],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009094184,0.001048879,0.9766174,0.0001198429,0.00004524598,0.00007772916,0.00004182347,0.0002716512,0.01268323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7234786,0.002424165,0.2539252,0.00007732931,0.00008471365,0.0004308071,0.0001859893,0.0001418021,0.01925142],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002862781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009576976,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02133817735250024,"score_gpt":0.2081011183880021,"score_spread":0.1867629410355018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}