{"id":"W2098897435","doi":"10.1109/glocom.2004.1378045","title":"Effective bandwidths under dynamic weighted round robin scheduling","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Network Traffic and Congestion Control","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Bandwidth allocation; Quality of service; Bandwidth (computing); Dynamic bandwidth allocation; Markov process; Poisson process; Poisson distribution; Distributed computing; Sizing; Dynamic priority scheduling; Mathematical optimization; Real-time computing; Computer network; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00273373,0.0005715821,0.0006611159,0.0008263214,0.0004379374,0.001305219,0.001853065,0.0004915466,0.0008161301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007400113,0.0003337058,0.0002975505,0.0006802639,0.001038497,0.002146272,0.0007896812,0.00062508,0.0001835202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001192747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001075564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001592445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997306,0.0009066897,0.00009700387,0.0003510456,0.0009778449,0.0003613585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964258,0.001511484,0.0006199637,0.0006078786,0.0006300247,0.0002048608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002987893,0.00005881798,0.000954159,0.0000669682,0.00005395682,0.0001775396,0.0001414791,0.6880575,0.01755703,0.2494841,0.0007302018,0.04241955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001393613,0.0000517405,0.0001756318,0.000004785663,0.00001232219,0.00005652751,0.00001712742,0.9641339,0.003306964,0.03110043,0.001110381,0.00001626681],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05300258,0.0002461095,0.9431298,0.00008357211,0.00003798484,0.00004116694,0.00003335243,0.0002885297,0.003136828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9072795,0.0001982909,0.09125949,0.00004276604,0.00005680111,0.00006766444,0.00003674634,0.00006922059,0.0009896455],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00273373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01445758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004611646449268803,"score_gpt":0.2233223560856747,"score_spread":0.2187107096364059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}