{"id":"W2098929222","doi":"10.1257/mic.2.4.1","title":"Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Excludability; Public good; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Mechanism design; Class (philosophy); Economics; Moral hazard; Zero (linguistics); Private information retrieval; Private good; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Incentive; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005879572,0.0008531319,0.001793596,0.00134787,0.0009994003,0.002888917,0.002010672,0.00254779,0.004446473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02620153,0.001257977,0.001011512,0.001034903,0.00246363,0.006418313,0.002856234,0.001689781,0.0006086227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001871641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001866228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008927023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006716407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946672,0.00288246,0.0003121639,0.0007871687,0.00067514,0.0006758786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870358,0.006418382,0.003351152,0.001730549,0.0007590413,0.0007050236],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001386903,0.0007833507,0.003047078,0.0005393645,0.0001985943,0.0004071624,0.0005617261,0.2792623,0.006811873,0.6206761,0.002694254,0.0836314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005133493,0.000531029,0.002066603,0.00016922,0.0001272171,0.0004567599,0.0003806522,0.4975237,0.004120234,0.4885663,0.005447973,0.00009702506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5010106,0.0007354492,0.4783762,0.001658463,0.00008725097,0.0003980125,0.0001742916,0.0004477524,0.01711211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407033,0.0002458174,0.05427931,0.00009111271,0.00002900969,0.000212089,0.00005329484,0.00004829172,0.004337818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005879572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03109449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07857650290041124,"score_gpt":0.3332854239641384,"score_spread":0.2547089210637272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}