{"id":"W2098929222","doi":"10.1257/mic.2.4.1","title":"Optimal Provision of Multiple Excludable Public Goods","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Excludability; Public good; Microeconomics; Outcome (game theory); Mechanism design; Class (philosophy); Economics; Moral hazard; Zero (linguistics); Private information retrieval; Private good; Mechanism (biology); Mathematical economics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Computer science; Incentive; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001719996,0.000191243,0.0005735442,0.0003313313,0.0004957816,0.0001660632,0.00107979,0.00005381225,0.0009253256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003430219,0.0001734282,0.0002953054,0.0002368574,0.0009503805,0.0008486161,0.0001600756,0.0002834415,0.001070977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002555751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004716767,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005235657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002249373,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974539,0.0001501369,0.001446564,0.0004442804,0.0001313798,0.0003737745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963184,0.0007309783,0.001899867,0.0006315851,0.0001333743,0.0002857819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006093247,0.0008907894,0.3241514,0.00000857947,0.0004853111,0.00003056435,0.003313162,0.07127051,0.01404928,0.02101839,0.09445463,0.4697181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002833697,0.0008139681,0.02834057,0.00001599738,0.00004410382,0.006444755,0.01284949,0.0181512,0.01716403,0.02350041,0.8886091,0.001232724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.983667,0.00009779012,0.01207595,0.001216913,0.0003907572,0.00014253,0.00005343453,0.00002254619,0.002333148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883492,0.0004426053,0.009616947,0.0002335686,0.0002906726,0.000008852136,0.00000377973,0.00002493573,0.001029442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07857650290041124,"score_gpt":0.3332854239641384,"score_spread":0.2547089210637272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}