{"id":"W2098957906","doi":"10.2466/pr0.101.3.739-753","title":"Mood State, Issue Involvement, and Argument Strength on Responses to Persuasive Appeals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mood; Moderation; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Likert scale; Elaboration; Elaboration likelihood model; Developmental psychology; Persuasion; Humanities","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001898791,0.0003994946,0.0004141601,0.0003519008,0.0003073241,0.0009806321,0.000122718,0.0004204367,0.002989284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0190453,0.0002297127,0.0002564247,0.0001775522,0.0003070432,0.0002508316,0.0004555412,0.0009713322,0.0004243606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001439732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001307784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001822821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003495994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986759,0.000749646,0.00006426816,0.0001407071,0.0002875729,0.00008182356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794072,0.01448851,0.00342738,0.000828386,0.0008408668,0.001007733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01846932,0.008075399,0.5896595,0.0005278855,0.000507585,0.0007969266,0.01426119,0.0007691631,0.2655376,0.0004672539,0.000768172,0.1001601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001669563,0.002370328,0.9905064,0.00001941649,0.000111017,0.0001241146,0.0007551996,0.0005632432,0.004716859,0.0002616065,0.0003808633,0.00002402224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988245,0.00002918926,0.0001201543,0.00001995562,0.00000923828,0.00001579853,0.00001635702,0.000004069274,0.0009606241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990508,0.00005536969,0.0002701927,0.0000463042,0.00002102625,0.00003705909,0.00005214185,0.000005609671,0.0004613335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002989284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01004189,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05007751125591443,"score_gpt":0.4188170262097836,"score_spread":0.3687395149538691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}