{"id":"W2098995101","doi":"10.1017/s0266462312000086","title":"THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1256,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Systematic review; English language; MEDLINE; Randomized controlled trial; Grey literature; Publication bias; Inclusion (mineral); Evidence-based medicine; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5241206,0.005461869,0.02067193,0.01772083,0.002759088,0.01003693,0.007054487,0.007335489,0.005285373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7714065,0.005425991,0.04944757,0.02290052,0.008239093,0.0117058,0.007929989,0.007033069,0.0007657263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01194084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01962885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004603135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009521703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2236079,0.4924686,0.2193411,0.0185297,0.04399368,0.002059083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1212257,0.7681131,0.06758669,0.02340008,0.01868183,0.0009925755],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003561733,0.00008629889,0.009700292,0.6340433,0.2895423,0.0005865795,0.001316091,0.001249578,0.0006882622,0.003278394,0.00328037,0.05266668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006125676,0.001151015,0.01468003,0.294725,0.6445183,0.0007548293,0.0006026644,0.002760418,0.002589264,0.01422167,0.01744741,0.0004237641],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01232905,0.9092237,0.04416166,0.007907435,0.004646267,0.01610484,0.002534852,0.0003678561,0.002724328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.388043,0.3502556,0.1657131,0.01174301,0.002816202,0.07734007,0.002266201,0.0004880435,0.001334717],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.586844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6928659822160735,"score_gpt":0.6822334080904336,"score_spread":0.01063257412563989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}