{"id":"W2099015169","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2015.10.010","title":"Examining the absorptive capacity construct: A validation study in the Pakistani banking context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Organizational and Employee Performance","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Absorptive capacity; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Internal consistency; Scale (ratio); Discriminant validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Consistency (knowledge bases); Validity; Computer science; Business; Psychology; Knowledge management; Psychometrics; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006227761,0.0003340244,0.0003247695,0.0008292556,0.001568919,0.0009402368,0.0003856923,0.0004637404,0.0011828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008987959,0.0002732698,0.0003675235,0.0009838645,0.001009223,0.0009542052,0.0008858686,0.0009759984,0.0003095111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008287249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002778198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00689809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01221689,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986682,0.0006067962,0.0001109953,0.0001176249,0.0003171948,0.0001793423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920036,0.003674332,0.001149445,0.0004722381,0.002201143,0.0004992168],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003151428,0.002116924,0.8920109,0.0002414026,0.00005268141,0.0009474194,0.04372654,0.0005848078,0.004463537,0.0009767971,0.0005873098,0.05397657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000637396,0.002623749,0.9524457,0.0001890041,0.00005526744,0.000551902,0.03722427,0.001189705,0.00195622,0.0003093818,0.003360086,0.00003099909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985523,0.00003683097,0.0002136281,0.00005329609,0.000004665335,0.0000884253,0.00003207881,0.000001284174,0.001017508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985042,0.0001205653,0.0009201839,0.00004039595,0.000006080316,0.0001050303,0.00007068869,0.000001712596,0.0002313319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00689809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03293592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05929938539114443,"score_gpt":0.2542031991743345,"score_spread":0.1949038137831901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}