{"id":"W2099015169","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2015.10.010","title":"Examining the absorptive capacity construct: A validation study in the Pakistani banking context","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Organizational and Employee Performance","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Absorptive capacity; Construct (python library); Context (archaeology); Construct validity; Internal consistency; Scale (ratio); Discriminant validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Consistency (knowledge bases); Validity; Computer science; Business; Psychology; Knowledge management; Psychometrics; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723671,0.00009944222,0.0000723602,0.0001470251,0.0003988463,0.0005754292,0.001901194,0.000008278798,0.000003697462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003962662,0.00005898152,0.0000114463,0.001780244,0.0003397479,0.001029026,0.0003810824,0.0001103023,0.00003755033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001165029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002018941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009861588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001938034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982034,0.0001145213,0.0001815891,0.0003551071,0.0008724153,0.0002729936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993217,0.00006700204,0.00008115858,0.0004568807,0.00003929424,0.00003395619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008176501,0.0001827667,0.7426233,0.00001392239,0.00002470383,0.00006322542,0.1216152,0.004292023,0.0006757023,0.1193739,0.001986924,0.009140151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008276207,0.0001237906,0.9349571,0.00002840823,0.00001325809,0.00001748624,0.04851444,0.01158757,0.0004251483,0.002523866,0.0006867115,0.0002946415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552427,0.000003231056,0.03693725,0.005592235,0.0002894152,0.0004457086,3.109999e-7,0.0000386767,0.001450499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927306,5.364731e-7,0.001385929,0.005805062,0.00003191314,0.00002690169,3.679157e-7,0.000002933006,0.00001571929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1923337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5548877,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05929938539114443,"score_gpt":0.2542031991743345,"score_spread":0.1949038137831901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}