{"id":"W2099069768","doi":"10.1109/tse.2005.106","title":"Analyzing the evolutionary history of the logical design of object-oriented software","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software evolution; Unified Modeling Language; Object-oriented design; Software system; Class (philosophy); Programming language; Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Sequence diagram; Class diagram; Abstraction; Object-oriented programming; Sequence (biology); Software; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Software construction","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00329146,0.000182372,0.000174206,0.0030481,0.0007685138,0.001362183,0.0004493118,0.0004359235,0.0005747259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01522747,0.0003478626,0.0002968354,0.002226571,0.0009479161,0.002711662,0.0005944439,0.0007212111,0.0001091731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001682192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001189419,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003525081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005273291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985023,0.0006352458,0.00009252697,0.0002062331,0.0005019116,0.00006183554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926267,0.003516371,0.001316278,0.0009220766,0.001449627,0.0001688276],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002245771,0.0002272698,0.3204443,0.0004006819,0.0001646834,0.0006397837,0.008270863,0.04107386,0.02045601,0.1118648,0.0008042299,0.495429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005843211,0.0006254491,0.4331594,0.0004084705,0.0002529107,0.001799472,0.004621373,0.3402411,0.03877927,0.1294488,0.05042516,0.0001802177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7357845,0.001151531,0.2572605,0.0005285609,0.00001696785,0.0001140836,0.0002182557,0.0001474564,0.004778227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466096,0.0006654807,0.1508315,0.00006088822,0.00001217632,0.00007352426,0.0004779529,0.00005383266,0.001215009],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003525081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01740712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02065955642586971,"score_gpt":0.2251681173874997,"score_spread":0.2045085609616299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}