{"id":"W2099237579","doi":"10.5267/j.msl.2012.05.011","title":"Strategic planning for waste management: A case study of Shiraz waste management","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science Letters","topic":"Strategic Planning and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Garbage; SWOT analysis; Business; Production (economics); Environmental economics; Operations management; Investment (military); Population; Strategic planning; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Waste management; Engineering; Marketing; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Political science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002022026,0.0004686082,0.0004460601,0.001932396,0.0008723334,0.0006786966,0.001117119,0.00004146129,0.00003582397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007748229,0.000436387,0.0001664784,0.003150363,0.0002488431,0.002021247,0.0007170959,0.000146504,0.00006007362],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008773971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000357489,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001842066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001014404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959198,0.00002324498,0.000698682,0.0009073762,0.001127155,0.001323709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998519,0.00003694546,0.0004992579,0.0008107787,0.00006006458,0.00007395711],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008904493,0.009988328,0.2707668,0.01597844,0.008126385,0.02610894,0.01057004,0.1311816,0.004393812,0.4275757,0.04733812,0.04708149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01092224,0.0002664028,0.01173791,0.0009615918,0.005864573,0.0001545038,0.9081738,0.04436839,0.0002380844,0.00213014,0.01182738,0.003354951],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9371985,0.00004575833,0.002202378,0.000369015,0.0006742819,0.001573385,0.000002952433,0.000160938,0.05777275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953416,0.000004571217,0.001369806,0.001659289,0.0005504638,0.0002544529,0.00001601123,0.00004195625,0.0007618325],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8976038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05080358583668956,"score_gpt":0.2773361396665771,"score_spread":0.2265325538298875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}