{"id":"W2099325539","doi":"10.1007/s11051-006-9154-x","title":"Health risk assessment for nanoparticles: A case for using expert judgment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nanoparticle Research","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Risk assessment; Nanoparticle; Nanotechnology; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0942184,0.0009529663,0.001507464,0.003557272,0.005543683,0.009440752,0.004417084,0.01392736,0.004591895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1737563,0.0004454988,0.001424826,0.001372854,0.009687123,0.007071227,0.004927378,0.008978213,0.0005025457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003985963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006670044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008761599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008754284,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9266226,0.05050544,0.003182743,0.00422074,0.01216303,0.003305418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7435656,0.2233221,0.004588238,0.009887395,0.0157953,0.002841314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006613326,0.0007877377,0.01782279,0.00096811,0.0006076327,0.01353299,0.03425412,0.01998515,0.002857176,0.7154655,0.03630077,0.1567568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001659851,0.0001655313,0.002244964,0.000926932,0.0001618333,0.002543428,0.00921779,0.0322724,0.001769504,0.9047956,0.04556331,0.0001726841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1635739,0.004954534,0.2956967,0.2872667,0.001296294,0.0008366307,0.000235617,0.0002147276,0.245925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9053774,0.0007333462,0.07764928,0.0117385,0.0003885866,0.0001764557,0.00004656964,0.0000530575,0.003836754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0942184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4982805,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2445090469362729,"score_gpt":0.5132395347696755,"score_spread":0.2687304878334026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}