{"id":"W2099362773","doi":"10.1504/ijem.2006.011168","title":"Method for consequence curves as applied to flood risks","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Emergency Management","topic":"Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Damages; Flood myth; Flooding (psychology); Risk analysis (engineering); Preparedness; Natural disaster; Emergency management; Domino effect; Environmental planning; Computer science; Civil engineering; Engineering; Forensic engineering; Business; Environmental science; Geography; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006340516,0.001454893,0.0007639927,0.006303059,0.001110409,0.002977955,0.001742984,0.001099332,0.01950447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0388973,0.0006136646,0.001807732,0.00421162,0.001919691,0.00457218,0.003083425,0.002391534,0.0033552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001287578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001452126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002632365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001809309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964791,0.0013791,0.0002839714,0.000489825,0.001234495,0.0001335139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857132,0.009549195,0.0006721124,0.001706695,0.002128629,0.0002301262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001727558,0.00008534881,0.005008115,0.0004759562,0.0000718235,0.0004545436,0.002029076,0.04061459,0.002051757,0.647078,0.00649727,0.2954607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001030654,0.0002414701,0.005693906,0.000288315,0.00007313985,0.001210876,0.001217645,0.2518445,0.004285447,0.5845255,0.1503499,0.0001662549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00417888,0.0001212852,0.9818656,0.0001241538,0.0000803462,0.0002870087,0.0003381546,0.0006914551,0.01231316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1562744,0.0005716145,0.8287258,0.000122402,0.00009333139,0.00240627,0.000800763,0.0009407893,0.0100646],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01950447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01846894352622722,"score_gpt":0.343372481689762,"score_spread":0.3249035381635348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}