{"id":"W2099370566","doi":"10.1111/1467-8551.12090","title":"Why Are Some Subsidiaries of Multinationals the Source of Novel Practices while Others Are Not? National, Corporate and Functional Influences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Management","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Subsidiary; Multinational corporation; Business; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Human resources; Industrial organization; Resource (disambiguation); Human resource management; Economic geography; Marketing; Economics; Management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125153,0.0001063745,0.0002111152,0.0002488496,0.0001183107,0.0002725828,0.0002359144,0.00003319672,0.00005581435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006362022,0.00009220329,0.00007081751,0.0002402955,0.0001709461,0.001744543,0.0001354881,0.0001073818,0.000003428874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002821117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003684466,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003693435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001169303,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982023,0.00001878799,0.0005236894,0.0001272461,0.00102194,0.0001060445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933074,0.0001196013,0.00419435,0.0000642735,0.00229926,0.00001513262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001847061,0.003235621,0.2502903,0.002370379,0.002648078,0.0002404813,0.0004970312,0.1086117,0.0007940184,0.3017787,0.3099457,0.01774095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003066861,0.00003127537,0.8515437,0.0009924413,0.0002063762,0.0001346196,0.004611813,0.004022899,0.00007944811,0.008647056,0.1263957,0.0002678451],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801736,0.001823453,0.002724931,0.01096734,0.0007300013,0.0003059327,0.00003833796,0.00001562198,0.003220709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956312,0.0001384132,0.0004007576,0.002941423,0.0005689113,0.000007180345,0.000008749274,0.000012783,0.0002906501],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6012533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3759941,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08844954410250624,"score_gpt":0.2592402318917778,"score_spread":0.1707906877892715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}