{"id":"W2099390337","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2015.04.19","title":"Morality, Rationality and Academic Dishonesty: A Partial Test of Situational Action Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Situational ethics; Morality; Test (biology); Action (physics); Academic dishonesty; Social psychology; Psychology; Dishonesty; Cheating; Political science; Law; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007622169,0.0004288392,0.000730754,0.00153627,0.0007660759,0.001800942,0.0008894222,0.0009306374,0.005981646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0383407,0.000435679,0.001165712,0.001118625,0.003862509,0.002096989,0.003051561,0.001566398,0.0002899269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005104019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009368062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002319598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001236301,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917259,0.003993541,0.0004909122,0.001420488,0.001867227,0.0005019467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925525,0.07563382,0.01553539,0.01008407,0.002901717,0.0032924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005802306,0.001088989,0.9610782,0.0001326875,0.0005028418,0.000168623,0.002858284,0.001782346,0.0009344534,0.01273206,0.0001518462,0.0179894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006418894,0.0006983318,0.9725865,0.00002799206,0.0001365108,0.0003439913,0.002137204,0.009596131,0.0004895205,0.01337716,0.0005085688,0.0000340217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910299,0.00008143114,0.002906269,0.0002174203,0.000009952714,0.00004117986,0.00008106959,0.0000129704,0.005619968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988845,0.000024585,0.0008474006,0.00003335893,0.000007312452,0.00002661374,0.00005234456,0.000002433314,0.0001214186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04031038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.232128394465919,"score_gpt":0.4499213285383053,"score_spread":0.2177929340723863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}