{"id":"W2099568788","doi":"10.1016/s0169-7722(02)00012-8","title":"A proposed model to include a residual NAPL saturation in a hysteretic capillary pressure–saturation relationship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Saturation (graph theory); Vadose zone; Capillary pressure; Residual; Groundwater; Soil science; Relative permeability; Chemistry; Permeability (electromagnetism); Geotechnical engineering; Environmental science; Geology; Porous medium; Porosity; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002819612,0.0005191995,0.0004777604,0.000344451,0.0004212828,0.0007978046,0.002176097,0.001878091,0.004945101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007793586,0.0003111734,0.0005759951,0.0003220832,0.0003870706,0.001295471,0.0004499588,0.0007170895,0.001158293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007203992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00649146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004269002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999861,0.00002383354,0.000006734417,0.00005718531,0.00002910305,0.00002203072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997591,0.00006247233,0.00001892593,0.00001873164,0.0001195935,0.00002112339],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007507324,0.00009713215,0.001516337,0.0001712789,0.00005660214,0.000339379,0.0001115441,0.9034101,0.01133448,0.05665717,0.00453898,0.02169197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009645578,0.00001143032,0.0001278511,0.000003866502,0.000009783282,0.00003486233,0.0000048426,0.99525,0.0005232248,0.002829292,0.001188194,0.000007074247],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05419267,0.0005582758,0.9206341,0.002384698,0.0005621792,0.0001814732,0.0007665043,0.001036179,0.01968394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058691,0.000766885,0.05362356,0.0005153653,0.0002012136,0.0004969358,0.0004756297,0.0001624309,0.03788892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00649146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01654303,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02366798532761933,"score_gpt":0.2386594602048854,"score_spread":0.2149914748772661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}