{"id":"W2099577355","doi":"10.1109/tpwrd.2008.923406","title":"A Half-Size Singularity Test Matrix for Fast and Reliable Passivity Assessment of Rational Models","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","topic":"Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Singularity; Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; Passivity; Admittance parameters; Applied mathematics; Mathematics; Hamiltonian matrix; Matrix (chemical analysis); Computation; Admittance; Mathematical analysis; Symmetric matrix; Algorithm; Physics; Engineering; Electrical impedance; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008808858,0.000138491,0.0001955218,0.00005269897,0.0002911322,0.00001978447,0.00006646816,0.00004015972,0.0001183052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000152176,0.0001367835,0.00009157962,0.0001100123,0.00007193879,0.0001776593,0.000001390055,0.0001437924,0.000002003504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003444227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001628062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003598162,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991796,0.00001820487,0.0002114845,0.0002285705,0.0001605079,0.0002016384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993036,0.0002517776,0.00007283664,0.0001650427,0.0001366581,0.000070082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001827701,0.03189092,0.03761018,0.000696005,0.00356147,0.00003304,0.01018801,0.3803465,0.3803907,0.09668005,0.02377862,0.03299687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01904503,0.008945407,0.032467,0.0004239865,0.001184543,0.00009205865,0.001121338,0.6799335,0.1739885,0.07427785,0.004913038,0.003607785],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3262361,0.0000208517,0.6710387,0.0001320807,0.0001319008,0.0001983644,0.0001796992,0.0000238021,0.002038511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884518,0.00001010005,0.01012833,0.00002967174,0.00003298436,0.00005887037,0.000008287983,0.00001471115,0.001265248],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6622157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5577869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0119631222667921,"score_gpt":0.2425863375763649,"score_spread":0.2306232153095728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}