{"id":"W2099681647","doi":"10.1139/f00-213","title":"Effective population size of winter-run chinook salmon based on microsatellite analysis of returning spawners","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Chinook wind; Oncorhynchus; Effective population size; Population; Population size; Biology; Fishery; Statistics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Endangered species; Population viability analysis; Ecology; Demography; Mathematics; Genetic diversity","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001277657,0.0001303999,0.0002113198,0.0006996298,0.0002077072,0.000260453,0.0003717916,0.0001366329,0.0006516004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00267696,0.0001075075,0.0001514771,0.0002414454,0.0002990932,0.0003918596,0.00017093,0.0001222713,0.0001097845],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004892649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003267783,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008592883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01694838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997733,0.00005841967,0.00002668278,0.00006277985,0.00005533913,0.00002343154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.0004371156,0.0001542004,0.00005381336,0.0002009096,0.00007869797],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001701621,0.0000231528,0.9485165,0.00005160221,0.0001408856,0.0002086435,0.0005173094,0.006725065,0.02249737,0.0008339557,0.000211697,0.02010369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000161537,0.0001351713,0.9805143,0.00001276208,0.00006799198,0.0003614567,0.0001538896,0.01540678,0.002178607,0.0006993802,0.0004258525,0.00002752064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978493,0.0001114804,0.001572081,0.000008401189,0.000001721917,0.000004119185,0.0001037021,0.000008395407,0.000340799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983591,0.00005371959,0.001076223,0.00000640052,0.000002288887,0.000008455288,0.0003535828,0.000004496848,0.0001357134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008592883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01708573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006183811552572643,"score_gpt":0.2027512395251243,"score_spread":0.1965674279725516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}