{"id":"W2099734777","doi":"10.1139/b01-129","title":"Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian Forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Canopy; Clearcutting; Species evenness; Forestry; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Perennial plant; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001894954,0.0001499722,0.0001606663,0.0005368023,0.000348678,0.0003210797,0.0001718063,0.00009629147,0.0004136955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003315197,0.0001097806,0.00009989697,0.0003380508,0.0003693867,0.000144508,0.0002861125,0.0001017348,0.00004588933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008587835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004132314,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05553229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2241928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998475,0.00002355079,0.00001367979,0.0000445292,0.00003043366,0.00004031081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999675,0.00002999611,0.000100668,0.00001790972,0.00006337465,0.0001130251],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009643839,0.00003270804,0.9915452,0.000009169832,0.00002848097,0.00009526596,0.0003755795,0.00005873348,0.005362882,0.00001596005,0.00003036323,0.00234925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.482181e-7,0.00001685061,0.999669,6.317946e-7,0.000002016117,0.00003231459,0.000133847,0.00003429395,0.00007796209,0.000001648136,0.00002989489,6.251801e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999908,0.00001839048,0.000008378642,9.665373e-7,2.069419e-7,7.267577e-7,0.0000239274,3.975625e-7,0.00003903205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995736,0.00002638469,0.00006138434,0.000004665282,7.922395e-7,0.000002542753,0.0002425275,4.478767e-7,0.00008758719],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1104181,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03407920766300288,"score_gpt":0.2419457316552188,"score_spread":0.2078665239922159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}