{"id":"W2099734777","doi":"10.1139/b01-129","title":"Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian Forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Botany","topic":"Bryophyte Studies and Records","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bryophyte; Species richness; Canopy; Clearcutting; Species evenness; Forestry; Ecology; Disturbance (geology); Habitat; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Perennial plant; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002212206,0.00008456026,0.0001976172,0.0000312762,0.0004234597,0.00005430312,0.0001893181,0.00006943873,0.00002081232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006606022,0.00003082087,0.00004088974,0.0002094231,0.0001778665,0.00008083227,0.00001308617,0.0004417222,4.150453e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001646346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000187901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01194381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8468236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993026,0.0001350999,0.0002285721,0.00005960577,0.00009053642,0.0001835747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994132,0.0001715747,0.0001285658,0.00003603682,0.00007757223,0.0001730814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003208651,0.00005052545,0.9442889,0.00001702152,0.00004587843,0.00005605767,0.004671854,0.00004159523,0.001231493,0.0002513731,0.02710759,0.02220564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001551978,0.0002968058,0.9916558,0.00005265102,0.00001105,0.0001263852,0.003279879,0.0001245255,0.00001095437,0.0001997824,0.004020138,0.00006684133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.988434,0.006725523,2.072832e-7,0.004157349,0.0002104043,0.00007921235,0.0000372091,0.000001475429,0.0003546239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991699,0.0003194748,0.0000393286,0.0002448556,0.000169799,8.319188e-7,0.000002416405,8.360115e-7,0.00005250102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8348798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9946358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03407920766300288,"score_gpt":0.2419457316552188,"score_spread":0.2078665239922159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}