{"id":"W2099764419","doi":"10.1017/s0008423900000111","title":"British Imperial Politics and Judicial Independence: The JudicialCommittee's Decision in the Canadian Case <i>Nadan v. TheKing</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Dominion; Law; Politics; Judicial review; Political science; Judicial independence; Constitution; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Government (linguistics); Separation of powers; Independence (probability theory); History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003977543,0.0003745675,0.0006273671,0.002045675,0.06437087,0.01182977,0.002819957,0.01071467,0.007229761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593529,0.0007351142,0.0005734218,0.004056821,0.01966229,0.002330251,0.003508443,0.01349077,0.0004384253],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1847853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1837811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986033,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9892166,0.001008988,0.0001664963,0.0005110978,0.002522361,0.006574427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937582,0.002098937,0.0003369685,0.0001520442,0.001968331,0.001685595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001117321,0.00004608957,0.005695495,0.0001246448,0.00003109875,0.00243143,0.0356145,0.0004745848,0.0004330968,0.8475733,0.09596951,0.01149459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002177527,0.00004199329,0.04763176,0.000855414,0.0002520345,0.001085893,0.06594902,0.001717927,0.001122276,0.05386793,0.8267642,0.0004937276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1797675,0.01384585,0.0006410916,0.1743444,0.001043488,0.0001013706,0.000276955,0.00003812232,0.6299412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247018,0.003911203,0.0003204913,0.02184959,0.0002504055,0.00003150041,0.0000638507,0.00003684781,0.04883422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9455335,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01397330661826646,"score_gpt":0.2902118117034354,"score_spread":0.276238505085169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}