{"id":"W2099785405","doi":"10.1109/vppc.2009.5289754","title":"Optimal design of a parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle using multi-objective genetic algorithms","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure","field":"Engineering","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Powertrain; Sizing; Automotive engineering; Fuel efficiency; Genetic algorithm; Component (thermodynamics); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Optimal design; Electric vehicle; Pareto principle; Pareto optimal; Mathematical optimization; Engineering; Power (physics); Torque; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005208352,0.000866515,0.0007041898,0.000619185,0.0004321668,0.0007716534,0.0005966108,0.0009455488,0.001704191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008769158,0.0005568797,0.0006388467,0.0004299777,0.0005324422,0.0004245216,0.0005162093,0.0004537963,0.0002099157],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007093019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001331105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006518474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005538652,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998549,0.0000448107,0.000005014305,0.00002989971,0.00004078672,0.00002452264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999765,0.0001154638,0.00003978037,0.000009847056,0.00005380965,0.00001611046],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127721,0.00001093641,0.0000876372,0.0000136262,0.000009298229,0.00001900009,0.000006623387,0.9944946,0.0004407953,0.0007107758,0.00007959226,0.004114267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001256828,0.0000192539,0.00004162941,0.000002229608,0.000004921147,0.000003992798,0.000005389294,0.9988074,0.0001516479,0.000755429,0.0001936116,0.000001887306],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651612,0.0004612775,0.8888145,0.0002993568,0.00007415338,0.0001637051,0.00009010392,0.0003645658,0.01321626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7849455,0.0003431634,0.2083359,0.00009506847,0.00003297183,0.0004482721,0.0001157612,0.0000629666,0.005620445],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006518474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01296109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01326805153741001,"score_gpt":0.2231085152903485,"score_spread":0.2098404637529385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}