{"id":"W2099914948","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00678.x","title":"Generating Cooperative Gain in a Vertical Partnership: A Supplier's Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transaction cost; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Welfare economics; Leverage (statistics); Sociology; Business administration; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002262381,0.0002712655,0.0003318914,0.001079005,0.001476133,0.001197828,0.0006476738,0.0001281649,0.0005235288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001696637,0.0002547954,0.00008628181,0.003399715,0.003307308,0.003342069,0.00001738444,0.0003738831,0.000019956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008939514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002730493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01170547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5417203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974901,0.00008858021,0.0007508551,0.0004749812,0.0002489099,0.0009465462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982039,0.0001237738,0.0003997728,0.000124491,0.0008978972,0.0002501586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007642555,0.000191632,0.0467763,0.0001107452,0.00003125987,0.001238793,0.01509853,0.0127526,0.002020999,0.9187441,0.001398593,0.001559995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003592916,0.007522543,0.05479788,0.001740793,0.0002168776,0.003860949,0.2077935,0.5657304,0.003995224,0.1380392,0.009280544,0.00342911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9548228,0.0002394714,0.0006316615,0.004634131,0.0003509439,0.0002238653,0.000007557528,0.00001214338,0.03907742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966852,0.000006902565,0.001627411,0.0009408666,0.0006006135,0.00001192232,0.000004491752,0.0000114594,0.0001111341],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7807049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1184017960843103,"score_gpt":0.3080262803172137,"score_spread":0.1896244842329034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}