{"id":"W2100148837","doi":"10.1080/10427710050122521","title":"Understanding Institutional Economics: 1918–1929","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Economic Thought","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":101,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Veblen good; Institutionalism; Commons; Dissent; Positive economics; Sociology; Institutional economics; Set (abstract data type); New institutionalism; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001065234,0.0001803574,0.0006114001,0.0002578518,0.0001769114,0.00002193194,0.0007308833,0.0001183448,0.005684953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004670433,0.0001763584,0.0005514898,0.00005194585,0.0005546046,0.0007859322,0.00004817015,0.0002858509,0.0004967386],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004763553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004593746,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003702771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003969649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997918,0.00003882328,0.001568445,0.0002281991,0.00002291048,0.0002236954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978389,0.00007592211,0.001527917,0.0004354885,0.00001827415,0.0001034904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008153214,0.00006377886,0.001201021,0.00001348202,0.0001379634,0.000001633011,0.0003767271,0.01685095,0.00001423604,0.9672002,0.01375257,0.0003059318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008117318,0.00005402563,0.0006788643,0.00004249594,0.00002268821,0.0001257948,0.00006998469,0.0005908668,0.00004946299,0.1894652,0.807883,0.0002059314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3823403,0.005245696,0.0008566438,0.001181445,0.0143997,0.0001763859,0.0001757059,0.00001642964,0.5956077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737779,0.0007349765,0.0005129503,0.0003320262,0.0006054079,0.000002444955,0.000001930626,0.0000227304,0.02400961],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7941304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999057,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09295970690628867,"score_gpt":0.213650011493024,"score_spread":0.1206903045867353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}