{"id":"W2100225786","doi":"10.1190/1.2952915","title":"Data-driven tomographic velocity analysis in tilted transversely isotropic media: A 3D case history from the Canadian Foothills","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysics","topic":"Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ATCO (Canada); SNC-Lavalin (Canada); Alberta Energy","funders":"","keywords":"Transverse isotropy; Anisotropy; Isotropy; Geology; Foothills; Model building; Geophysical imaging; Surface (topology); Stack (abstract data type); Reflection (computer programming); Stacking; Geometry; Seismology; Optics; Physics; Computer science; Mathematics; Nuclear magnetic resonance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001400702,0.0001342412,0.0002142721,0.000217581,0.000275882,0.00001835669,0.0005041597,0.0000781476,0.0007654821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002453983,0.0001065167,0.00008764081,0.0008039133,0.0002474525,0.0002220272,0.00001415572,0.0002846663,0.00007602373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004786419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003124467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9497704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9068505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988742,0.00009909894,0.0001736017,0.0003300505,0.0002264221,0.0002965786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989917,0.0001780156,0.00005675405,0.0005934233,0.00003360814,0.0001464583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003247503,0.00005912197,0.8185742,0.000008843942,0.0005062216,0.003548062,0.01157222,0.001424137,0.000007866204,0.00003900996,0.1061031,0.05812476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003534546,0.00003445825,0.7490601,0.00001129257,0.0003117023,0.00005301983,0.0003697747,0.158133,0.00001084749,0.0005553544,0.09074966,0.0003573917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954745,0.0005248117,0.0001415251,0.0007169419,0.0002454472,0.0001159701,0.00163988,0.0000744702,0.00106648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953334,0.0001287848,0.0007366017,0.002279887,0.00009038828,9.799342e-7,0.001391528,0.000003644559,0.00003472611],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1567088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8381492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04210648285660735,"score_gpt":0.2047481497253792,"score_spread":0.1626416668687719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}