{"id":"W2100257068","doi":"10.1103/physreva.72.012326","title":"Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Decoy; Quantum key distribution; Protocol (science); Computer science; Key (lock); State (computer science); Statistical physics; Physics; Quantum; Algorithm; Quantum mechanics; Computer security; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002600771,0.0005714794,0.0006873099,0.0004912892,0.0009671988,0.0009832132,0.001032342,0.001308006,0.004220956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006883328,0.000328972,0.0003601987,0.0007577029,0.003674312,0.003432686,0.002035459,0.00178926,0.000476369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001325286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001229991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003618594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004198065,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983081,0.0007481136,0.00006985376,0.0002285742,0.0005124986,0.000132947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968972,0.001661076,0.0003391512,0.0007528458,0.0002306253,0.000119052],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003498812,0.0001284,0.001270199,0.0002925531,0.00004346008,0.0001189861,0.0002178819,0.05350237,0.04124966,0.8724079,0.001302351,0.02911633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001921392,0.0005810726,0.0008202256,0.00007664093,0.00006232083,0.0003203545,0.00009483144,0.5546927,0.06464483,0.3670306,0.01133577,0.0001485292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1565188,0.001372007,0.8276113,0.001333095,0.00009772291,0.0002564469,0.000131269,0.0004520791,0.01222742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.882979,0.0006702791,0.1138334,0.0001662135,0.00004783425,0.0002581711,0.00008702335,0.00006887909,0.001889248],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004220956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01412052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02955850387010898,"score_gpt":0.3587452292035013,"score_spread":0.3291867253333923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}