{"id":"W2100263606","doi":"10.4103/2278-0203.143230","title":"Comparison of two three-dimensional cephalometric analysis computer software","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodontics; Intraclass correlation; Software; Statistical analysis; Cephalometric analysis; Statistical software; Reliability (semiconductor); Cone beam computed tomography; Significant difference; Mathematics; Computer science; Computed tomography; Medicine; Reproducibility; Statistics; Physics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006973451,0.0005690265,0.0006691049,0.004300507,0.0002913626,0.001487145,0.0007008163,0.0004615003,0.005574742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02321899,0.0003839938,0.0009217185,0.001935783,0.0005839649,0.0009661621,0.001051268,0.0004404175,0.0006362504],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005187557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000741331,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009825928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906148,0.002822725,0.001358882,0.001077333,0.003884662,0.0002415883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759226,0.01324802,0.001815627,0.001274488,0.007348903,0.0003904438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01118507,0.0006825417,0.1933935,0.001399275,0.001045319,0.0002064718,0.002042725,0.004305114,0.03756457,0.004080596,0.006671202,0.7374236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006552,0.005475146,0.8392947,0.000533828,0.001527123,0.003352173,0.002821031,0.0678758,0.05001826,0.0046327,0.02302318,0.0004394667],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305658,0.003023812,0.1469104,0.0003857275,0.0004204929,0.0009415491,0.0022104,0.003915812,0.01162596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8931965,0.000759554,0.1006136,0.00009963603,0.00009075685,0.001128228,0.001736705,0.0004836678,0.001891285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006973451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03687954,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03308208381351682,"score_gpt":0.3492745150664707,"score_spread":0.3161924312529538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}