{"id":"W2100263606","doi":"10.4103/2278-0203.143230","title":"Comparison of two three-dimensional cephalometric analysis computer software","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","topic":"Dental Radiography and Imaging","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodontics; Intraclass correlation; Software; Statistical analysis; Cephalometric analysis; Statistical software; Reliability (semiconductor); Cone beam computed tomography; Significant difference; Mathematics; Computer science; Computed tomography; Medicine; Reproducibility; Statistics; Physics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002634573,0.0001254138,0.0005885494,0.002474504,0.0001814183,0.0001127678,0.0007090608,0.00002861765,0.0001023931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004887857,0.00009986234,0.000493912,0.006946082,0.0004707416,0.0005900094,0.0001179557,0.0002279729,0.00001370399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004028158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008674929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003792563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003705042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971392,0.00009425921,0.0008167001,0.0002250128,0.001446262,0.0002785939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975833,0.0004238754,0.0009326217,0.0002860273,0.0005797881,0.0001943687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001587205,0.000130508,0.9721292,0.000009966353,0.000140141,0.00002062939,0.00004415266,0.005110386,0.001573973,0.0001193979,0.0002047845,0.02050103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005083386,0.0001502176,0.9469128,0.00004504444,0.0003934489,0.0002053475,0.00001721358,0.04988508,0.001500137,0.0001936734,0.00007670813,0.0001120182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6783878,0.0002545907,0.3203811,0.00001428543,0.0008186054,0.00002619828,0.000001729753,0.000007607946,0.0001080795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8972127,0.000001346899,0.1025899,0.00005138295,0.0001206334,1.91401e-7,6.010009e-7,0.000005564543,0.00001769782],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2188249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4072268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03308208381351682,"score_gpt":0.3492745150664707,"score_spread":0.3161924312529538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}