{"id":"W2100424929","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090325","title":"Party Talk: Assessing the Feminist Rhetoric of Women Leadership Candidates in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Legitimacy; Opposition (politics); Politics; Political science; Feminism; Ideology; Period (music); Representation (politics); Sociology; Gender studies; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190935,0.00005416302,0.0001270291,0.0001469595,0.000411084,0.0001373167,0.0004965514,0.00002680281,0.00005425253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00122439,0.00003863524,0.00002640364,0.0006204026,0.001010349,0.0002061373,0.000006115785,0.0001629296,5.699662e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004370388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04031232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929507,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977492,0.0001112298,0.0002812941,0.00008987543,0.0005290163,0.001239362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979253,0.0001593895,0.0001122147,0.00008970231,0.0001651699,0.001548204],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001292672,0.00001119778,0.120263,0.000005270861,0.000003317845,0.00007705986,0.0137237,0.00003816681,0.0001678423,0.8639601,0.0003510539,0.001397952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001037702,0.0000369852,0.8869553,0.00003235307,0.000004508701,0.00002070037,0.09620246,0.00005350777,0.0004328327,0.01384232,0.002230206,0.00008510196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743777,0.00006320403,0.000007656237,0.01175092,0.0003384515,0.00004428306,0.000004105836,8.178733e-7,0.01341285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988436,0.00000160792,0.00002337255,0.0009255349,0.0001301956,3.838002e-7,1.084723e-7,0.000001688477,0.0000735074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8501179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06387645086532923,"score_gpt":0.3349863771861578,"score_spread":0.2711099263208286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}