{"id":"W2100535108","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00508.x","title":"Fiscal policy, rent seeking, and growth under electoral uncertainty: theory and evidence from the OECD","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Incentive; Economics; Rent-seeking; Fiscal policy; Government (linguistics); Government spending; Work (physics); Construct (python library); Power (physics); Politics; Empirical evidence; Public economics; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Welfare","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003757373,0.0003021444,0.0007194086,0.001385709,0.0007875748,0.002414712,0.0004002309,0.0008044872,0.00368786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01384525,0.0001613531,0.0004706617,0.002813687,0.002007631,0.001312291,0.0009077438,0.0008383488,0.0003538637],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003285902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001591784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09194175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04682919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.0004867509,0.00003007419,0.00006536362,0.000111607,0.000130732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889474,0.007610159,0.002048529,0.0004647429,0.0006185744,0.0003106626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008685353,0.0002339584,0.6725701,0.0003129625,0.0003686253,0.0008698193,0.001332256,0.1821801,0.0001865645,0.08753724,0.01228158,0.0412582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004573684,0.0002577045,0.5637649,0.0003583719,0.0003990684,0.0004530468,0.006867973,0.1297931,0.000666024,0.2665539,0.03031233,0.0001161465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9635606,0.003711333,0.00309391,0.006544857,0.00002728104,0.00002254859,0.001703069,0.00005750686,0.02127887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980171,0.001131676,0.0001588627,0.00009651208,0.0000199746,0.00000712486,0.0002467097,0.000004215152,0.0003178331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09194175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1828132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1420882566431439,"score_gpt":0.1966785329010022,"score_spread":0.05459027625785837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}