{"id":"W2100581723","doi":"","title":"Condorcet admissibility: Indeterminacy and path-dependence under majority voting on interconnected decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Munich University)","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Condorcet method; Judgement; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Majority rule; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Voting; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Path (computing); Scope (computer science); Choice set; Computer science; Mathematics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02670662,0.0008591654,0.002580454,0.00235159,0.00376107,0.006991946,0.003113503,0.00356982,0.007522875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1243059,0.001169286,0.002833792,0.002963143,0.01239822,0.01493714,0.006199464,0.009191639,0.0005511706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004741472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002664678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004637671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002988703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9776963,0.01239092,0.001224918,0.003329989,0.003840031,0.001517805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8474754,0.1276967,0.007605926,0.009622006,0.005463124,0.002136921],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006226828,0.00002661364,0.0008187332,0.00005285839,0.00003746017,0.0001066418,0.0004670884,0.008757258,0.0001549101,0.9829013,0.0006465907,0.005968352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001878726,0.000007262854,0.0001465508,0.00001230266,0.000007318393,0.00002708879,0.00003841328,0.02481686,0.00007785565,0.9744803,0.0003581845,0.000008972858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2821094,0.001186392,0.6392586,0.01045342,0.0001423114,0.0004261465,0.000769073,0.0002180326,0.0654366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183676,0.0005317692,0.0737371,0.000518147,0.0001993992,0.0004531845,0.0003227461,0.00007764919,0.005792355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02670662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1412398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07801215494727368,"score_gpt":0.2198154879708742,"score_spread":0.1418033330236006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}