{"id":"W2100616917","doi":"10.1016/j.cam.2006.05.036","title":"Computing statistics for Hamiltonian systems: A case study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Scientific Research and Discoveries","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mathematics; Ergodic theory; Verlet integration; Hamiltonian system; Symplectic geometry; Applied mathematics; Hamiltonian (control theory); Numerical integration; Statistic; Numerical analysis; Statistical physics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Molecular dynamics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004868741,0.000385284,0.0008393899,0.001204927,0.002080703,0.00312743,0.001461477,0.002434433,0.003761482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03454335,0.0003218548,0.0009438858,0.002739965,0.002713456,0.003904966,0.001734545,0.001698824,0.0002209172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001604317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001600474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009965102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01045234,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971654,0.001549055,0.0001368172,0.0002354484,0.0006831526,0.0002301311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453053,0.04901483,0.0007547793,0.002097333,0.001763667,0.001064009],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004458179,0.000986384,0.01419176,0.0005267708,0.0001237298,0.003707375,0.002377371,0.1948101,0.002946535,0.7017619,0.00750118,0.07062098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001258988,0.0001820921,0.002330771,0.00003409998,0.00004337624,0.001065683,0.0009118161,0.630382,0.00237087,0.3579575,0.004552413,0.00004352425],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.686635,0.001229966,0.2806702,0.00628819,0.0000834271,0.0003053646,0.0004641863,0.000506912,0.02381673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964954,0.0004162664,0.09955916,0.0001498899,0.00007732621,0.00008277447,0.0001586381,0.00009725324,0.002963201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009965102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02574867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01977257603770793,"score_gpt":0.2987248431348637,"score_spread":0.2789522670971558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}