{"id":"W2100688287","doi":"10.1016/j.jconhyd.2005.05.013","title":"Monitoring trichloroethene remediation at an iron permeable reactive barrier using stable carbon isotopic analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contaminant Hydrology","topic":"Environmental remediation with nanomaterials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Permeable reactive barrier; Environmental remediation; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Isotope analysis; Zerovalent iron; Chemistry; Groundwater; Groundwater remediation; Contamination; Adsorption; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001556037,0.0002005017,0.0002181821,0.0002851871,0.0003917054,0.0002918201,0.0003654299,0.0004853033,0.0005647883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002704513,0.000116454,0.0001228245,0.0001918924,0.0001752155,0.0002795162,0.0001632116,0.0002755362,0.0001279018],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004096635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003007129,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006336495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01042072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998578,0.000009824519,0.000006084077,0.00002943658,0.00006893515,0.00002801677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998567,0.00003647366,0.00002397652,0.00001024692,0.00005810205,0.00001455448],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000982769,0.00001448986,0.00122552,0.000009657695,0.000003457602,0.00002330582,0.00001630188,0.0001005665,0.9973806,0.00001819581,0.00002002679,0.001089599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006110393,0.0001027544,0.004653823,0.00000118424,0.000007882019,0.00004203644,0.00002848147,0.001841617,0.9930779,0.000009556034,0.0002250719,0.00000340081],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977871,0.00004803738,0.001604104,0.0000238444,0.000004588353,0.000007250236,0.00007308198,0.00003994958,0.0004120771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970934,0.00008274159,0.001804756,0.00001259953,0.000002006647,0.000007529437,0.00008761017,0.000008571934,0.0009005973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006336495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01259923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01101185863697833,"score_gpt":0.2343725563580905,"score_spread":0.2233606977211121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}