{"id":"W2100965054","doi":"10.1007/s10546-008-9339-1","title":"Assessing Tower Flux Footprint Climatology and Scaling Between Remotely Sensed and Eddy Covariance Measurements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boundary-Layer Meteorology","topic":"Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; BIOCAP Canada","keywords":"Eddy covariance; Footprint; Environmental science; Flux (metallurgy); Lidar; Atmospheric sciences; Meteorology; Remote sensing; Wind speed; Advection; Climatology; Geography; Geology; Ecosystem; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005029894,0.0002140743,0.0003589846,0.0000685023,0.0005169779,0.00008666756,0.0001361488,0.0002249481,0.0001139061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006201035,0.0002045762,0.00003852174,0.0001306847,0.0006629667,0.0002229267,0.0002557173,0.0002604633,0.00003345683],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008314607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003298031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002098547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000787867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982197,0.0002048756,0.0003526,0.0005305962,0.0002388015,0.0004534755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993318,0.0001255176,0.0001285075,0.0002478474,0.00001605635,0.0001503049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005371427,0.00004460576,0.9416168,0.00001184473,0.00007798113,0.0001240917,0.0004887013,0.0008377808,0.04238342,0.0001485487,0.00007517935,0.0141373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001435796,0.0001493771,0.9694811,0.00001802254,0.0001125767,0.001759103,0.00003721744,0.009851635,0.001431474,0.003115882,0.01208757,0.0005202492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868645,0.0001640559,0.0092551,0.0003589138,0.000168638,0.0001728872,0.000008216593,0.00005153556,0.002956152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800171,0.00004463289,0.01940018,0.0002798499,0.00003571123,0.000005752326,0.00001979611,0.00001921545,0.0001778187],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04095194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8342376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05915225306224926,"score_gpt":0.2732626673411473,"score_spread":0.214110414278898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}