{"id":"W2100996735","doi":"10.3732/ajb.1200503","title":"Historical ecology: Using unconventional data sources to test for effects of global environmental change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Global change; Ecology; Historical ecology; Climate change; Herbarium; Generality; Chronosequence; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental change; Disturbance (geology); Plant community; Environmental resource management; Biology; Ecological succession; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04285271,0.001050588,0.0008487679,0.01281415,0.0009644907,0.004075849,0.002491334,0.001157062,0.002820928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1233771,0.0006739291,0.0009092314,0.01600008,0.001872873,0.009065886,0.00493866,0.001806033,0.0006923761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009618042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001654174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005781339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009397028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9764159,0.0141367,0.003073305,0.00241825,0.003647488,0.0003084073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8167214,0.1077799,0.03005268,0.03034619,0.01320266,0.00189716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002589241,0.0001507122,0.712694,0.002796168,0.003012666,0.000344968,0.002925785,0.00314648,0.001328848,0.02466775,0.00882286,0.2398508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001046143,0.0005881408,0.7628604,0.004613193,0.001560099,0.0007231621,0.004815525,0.0108081,0.003110927,0.07514961,0.1353538,0.0003123152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.383567,0.04889603,0.3923709,0.01644418,0.002867728,0.001660025,0.08059625,0.001336989,0.07226086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151646,0.01435251,0.2279481,0.003337419,0.001392136,0.002056416,0.0329241,0.000361489,0.002463262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04285271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2266295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01807686995476583,"score_gpt":0.2563925948702199,"score_spread":0.2383157249154541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}