{"id":"W2101044465","doi":"10.1109/lawp.2005.857041","title":"A compact and low-profile metamaterial ring antenna with vertical polarization","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters","topic":"Antenna Design and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":213,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metamaterial antenna; Microstrip antenna; Patch antenna; Metamaterial; Physics; Optics; Antenna measurement; Microstrip; Coaxial antenna; Antenna efficiency; Standing wave ratio; Antenna factor; Antenna (radio); Electrical engineering; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009891324,0.0003335327,0.0004610184,0.0001520075,0.0001062411,0.0003254554,0.0007341655,0.0005366307,0.001132829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001869809,0.0001636144,0.0003106265,0.0003049937,0.0001802461,0.0003682556,0.0003619437,0.0002696336,0.001055025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002274286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001208964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007932973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009737282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998801,0.00001852501,0.000007482824,0.00003138589,0.00004013812,0.00002233373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999778,0.00003434652,0.00006517166,0.00005572631,0.00004263444,0.00002413742],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000359312,0.00005100378,0.0008582258,0.0001135934,0.00003611519,0.0002225023,0.00002605644,0.006542826,0.9016404,0.004722746,0.001548305,0.08387896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009797716,0.001211157,0.002831676,0.00002068984,0.00007270783,0.003057801,0.00004495606,0.1295324,0.8387325,0.001427365,0.02289797,0.00007275222],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3536319,0.0008521885,0.6268021,0.0004920299,0.0002808796,0.00004655582,0.0002309769,0.002383353,0.01527994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8199551,0.0002223697,0.1724869,0.0001288433,0.00006778891,0.00003621579,0.0001431203,0.00005502182,0.006904575],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001132829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003789663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006876750209106283,"score_gpt":0.1928619659320675,"score_spread":0.1859852157229613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}