{"id":"W2101073310","doi":"10.1139/f05-200","title":"Experimental determination of the sources of otolith carbon and associated isotopic fractionation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Otolith; Rainbow trout; Isotopes of carbon; Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Fractionation; Carbon fibers; Stable isotope ratio; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Total organic carbon; Fishery; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002956741,0.00003878937,0.00009733593,0.0000547597,0.000133536,0.00002126681,0.0001083421,0.00002439796,0.00009333549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111855,0.00002669512,0.00002155829,0.0001750863,0.0008087033,0.0001522926,0.00001335307,0.00003343829,9.204853e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005328496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006674827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0194825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03891147,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999448,0.00004645736,0.0002033156,0.00005909115,0.0001614655,0.00008165115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995588,0.00006013054,0.0002981275,0.00003471886,0.00001107941,0.00003713897],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[7.986689e-7,0.00000819254,0.9963509,0.000001350774,0.000003007933,5.823132e-7,0.0005735514,0.00003486878,0.001584252,0.00006167954,0.0000404142,0.00134043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001173249,0.0001364584,0.984226,0.00001533374,0.00001766066,0.00001549054,0.00140813,0.00319921,0.009167206,0.001442055,0.0002109517,0.00004413279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972264,0.0001144575,0.00001662263,0.0003836881,0.000069812,0.0000377,6.495206e-7,4.150771e-7,0.002150238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996331,0.000003628241,0.0002233821,0.0000321091,0.0000102688,6.281321e-7,1.159102e-7,0.000001205839,0.00009559003],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01942896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007989836252233866,"score_gpt":0.2047886302015354,"score_spread":0.1967987939493015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}