{"id":"W2101073310","doi":"10.1139/f05-200","title":"Experimental determination of the sources of otolith carbon and associated isotopic fractionation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, Davis; Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Otolith; Rainbow trout; Isotopes of carbon; Chemistry; Environmental chemistry; Fractionation; Carbon fibers; Stable isotope ratio; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Biology; Total organic carbon; Fishery; Chromatography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008000897,0.001322916,0.0005434674,0.0004738243,0.001096757,0.0005964194,0.001215475,0.0008489956,0.002644871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001343587,0.000916787,0.0003879616,0.0004694269,0.001755374,0.0007316383,0.001473039,0.001691684,0.0007570927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001602514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002359572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005906734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01943208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981933,0.0001050811,0.0002165304,0.0007043745,0.000476229,0.0003044319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980409,0.0003549371,0.0005253492,0.00047316,0.0003233232,0.0002823175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009511053,0.0007268416,0.003115078,0.00005968806,0.00002791173,0.00003075201,0.0001070799,0.0001973373,0.9908393,0.0001910082,0.0001238462,0.003630124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000455264,0.006255419,0.04273884,0.00002456016,0.0002247647,0.0001984126,0.00007537697,0.002577509,0.9405219,0.0007886428,0.00603841,0.0001009025],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775562,0.0002588526,0.01679422,0.00008909512,0.00009201909,0.001320868,0.001108474,0.0002706106,0.002509613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9258729,0.000742576,0.0516787,0.0005189069,0.00008409924,0.008318638,0.002522124,0.000334121,0.009927923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005906734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01174468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007989836252233866,"score_gpt":0.2047886302015354,"score_spread":0.1967987939493015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}