{"id":"W2101091975","doi":"10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.043","title":"Elucidation of the binding preferences of peptide recognition modules: SH3 and PDZ domains","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"FEBS Letters","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"PDZ domain; Peptide; Computational biology; SH3 domain; Plasma protein binding; Binding selectivity; Protein–protein interaction; Binding site; Domain (mathematical analysis); Binding domain; Modular design; Biology; Biochemistry; Computer science; Phosphorylation; Mathematics; Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005049274,0.000497222,0.0009216426,0.001170411,0.000154385,0.0005475972,0.000784062,0.0006056553,0.0008296852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005856613,0.0002719806,0.0002759763,0.00107357,0.0003787088,0.0006393209,0.0002915704,0.0009214924,0.0009079951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004476443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004333131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007780186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009726709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998668,0.0000228378,0.00001053202,0.00002877255,0.00005943044,0.00001152777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997957,0.000101989,0.00002627057,0.000007860169,0.00005314707,0.00001505472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009961658,0.00006181684,0.0007705592,0.006579606,0.0001095501,0.0001565502,0.00004473607,0.003474315,0.01188899,0.009903635,0.008922712,0.957988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006760222,0.0002962296,0.005952865,0.001823269,0.0001746479,0.002992661,0.00009125903,0.005860226,0.01897209,0.01236868,0.9513343,0.00006606663],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002705184,0.9929433,0.001954925,0.0004247916,0.00007251805,0.000009538277,0.00003958403,0.00001790226,0.001832162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01373713,0.9822059,0.002746775,0.0001853563,0.0001148183,0.00001909905,0.00007544461,0.000003529399,0.0009119797],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001170411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003247917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09481297398740399,"score_gpt":0.323108654701331,"score_spread":0.228295680713927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}