{"id":"W2101108737","doi":"10.1890/14-1261.1","title":"Ecological and biogeographic null hypotheses for comparing rarefaction curves","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Monographs","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Estimator; Abundance (ecology); Null hypothesis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Ecology; Null model; Relative abundance distribution; Species diversity; Poisson distribution; Sampling distribution; Relative species abundance; Biology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004458407,0.0001504376,0.0002540607,0.00005863171,0.000296211,0.00002168425,0.0001310074,0.0001404377,0.0002162863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003278812,0.0001137187,0.00008938137,0.0002323724,0.0005425009,0.0001425506,0.000173018,0.0001231999,0.00005543979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003849008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004395385,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001686306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004907707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989367,0.00008982534,0.0002150543,0.0003486172,0.0001032954,0.0003065335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992373,0.0004053339,0.00008821686,0.0000976811,0.00002008512,0.0001513879],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003708762,0.0002117417,0.9942546,0.00001085536,0.00002500993,0.000002315419,0.00006183147,0.0001639306,0.00002775525,0.0007541665,0.003945137,0.0005055189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004817136,0.0005385556,0.9731599,0.00000659663,0.00002750618,0.000005913036,0.0001438045,0.001823602,0.0000113222,0.02042619,0.003210703,0.0001641618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925479,0.0004600035,0.0002969682,0.0007986712,0.0001815415,0.0004580363,0.000007817867,0.0001087356,0.005140295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964172,0.0005125495,0.001915405,0.0008257661,0.00001797491,0.0002078593,0.00001381544,0.000005947799,0.0000834493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02109472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4637316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05322763643604191,"score_gpt":0.2640447492951052,"score_spread":0.2108171128590633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}