{"id":"W2101108737","doi":"10.1890/14-1261.1","title":"Ecological and biogeographic null hypotheses for comparing rarefaction curves","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Monographs","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Rarefaction (ecology); Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Estimator; Abundance (ecology); Null hypothesis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Ecology; Null model; Relative abundance distribution; Species diversity; Poisson distribution; Sampling distribution; Relative species abundance; Biology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1220215,0.001731776,0.002961373,0.003744442,0.001266511,0.005388109,0.005107828,0.004503112,0.007565758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3170881,0.0008291952,0.004348433,0.002769644,0.01397262,0.0058779,0.004328659,0.004089588,0.001838007],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002202493,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000585721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002282097,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8589088,0.07834696,0.0125599,0.01996849,0.02613578,0.004080161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6059086,0.3002348,0.03232525,0.04241838,0.01579528,0.003317658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008090295,0.001204659,0.1592419,0.005017228,0.005048865,0.003657912,0.006446203,0.04780213,0.01917374,0.5499284,0.006731216,0.1876574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001440445,0.006160077,0.09682944,0.001586738,0.0009210954,0.00418084,0.00243198,0.2582472,0.0196709,0.5904106,0.01737768,0.0007430454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796379,0.0007565499,0.8045223,0.0007545396,0.0006120059,0.001235843,0.001847414,0.0007192208,0.009914241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7294459,0.0003702584,0.2554143,0.001294176,0.0005149571,0.007919807,0.003481885,0.0004510173,0.001107747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1220215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6453191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05322763643604191,"score_gpt":0.2640447492951052,"score_spread":0.2108171128590633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}