{"id":"W2101131792","doi":"10.5555/2429759.2430111","title":"Construction operations simulation under structural adequacy constraints: the Stonecutters Bridge case study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Winter Simulation Conference","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Perspective (graphical); Resource (disambiguation); Sequence (biology); Resource allocation; Computer science; Engineering; Bridge maintenance; Construction management; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00134352,0.0005982322,0.0007530068,0.0006917327,0.0007022986,0.001150707,0.001022693,0.001633605,0.003364303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003335352,0.0004573469,0.0007168009,0.001223981,0.0008133929,0.0008087187,0.0008411662,0.0008367052,0.000166324],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001625835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001954888,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04395485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04424669,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993227,0.0003613834,0.00003090962,0.00006118158,0.0001090197,0.0001149209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968304,0.002474259,0.0001320636,0.0001877981,0.0002494876,0.000125944],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001302406,0.0002150953,0.004550536,0.00003367636,0.00002324658,0.0004262146,0.0002928361,0.9877082,0.0006692437,0.002319545,0.0001599241,0.003471219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004443259,0.0001139491,0.001357658,0.000006022376,0.0000131201,0.000028955,0.0004098576,0.9963336,0.0007062973,0.0006469809,0.0003292901,0.00000994717],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839484,0.00003045334,0.0102723,0.00008864901,0.000005201374,0.00008886908,0.0002218216,0.00005898008,0.005285315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892104,0.0000436424,0.00946032,0.000009628598,0.000002211511,0.00009744275,0.0001749419,0.00001344499,0.0009880072],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04395485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08739799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04768751709199122,"score_gpt":0.3056269249822584,"score_spread":0.2579394078902672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}