{"id":"W2101131792","doi":"10.5555/2429759.2430111","title":"Construction operations simulation under structural adequacy constraints: the Stonecutters Bridge case study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Winter Simulation Conference","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Perspective (graphical); Resource (disambiguation); Sequence (biology); Resource allocation; Computer science; Engineering; Bridge maintenance; Construction management; Construction engineering; Civil engineering; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001816455,0.0002629988,0.0001799805,0.0001319514,0.0003794183,0.0002348159,0.0001295099,0.000107585,0.0007828848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003853071,0.000214049,0.0000731636,0.0002335982,0.000233532,0.001106183,0.00002754421,0.0002978286,0.00006219517],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001216187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003690815,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008350596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000169396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986051,0.0001438958,0.0004877879,0.0002231846,0.000241313,0.0002986726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990366,0.0001862004,0.00006737443,0.0003329764,0.0002669094,0.0001099278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000970262,0.00002458283,0.007936542,0.000006950973,0.00007550559,0.000005441882,0.004820536,0.9519596,0.000162555,0.004319777,0.00002359667,0.03065519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005918335,0.00003899029,0.01716687,0.00001649462,0.00007004882,0.0004691287,0.01148359,0.9693677,0.0001075846,0.0001789738,0.0002168329,0.0002919014],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6415148,0.00002861992,0.3559702,0.00008600816,0.001257186,0.0004541652,0.00001739488,0.0002259063,0.0004456286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990277,0.000001498336,0.0003964902,0.0001182171,0.0003165175,0.00004196141,0.00003158916,0.00002725787,0.00003878597],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3575128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8728665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04768751709199122,"score_gpt":0.3056269249822584,"score_spread":0.2579394078902672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}