{"id":"W2101206279","doi":"10.1007/s00216-010-4207-5","title":"Nanoparticles as contrast agents for in-vivo bioimaging: current status and future perspectives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","topic":"Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":485,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Particle Physics","funders":"","keywords":"Nanotechnology; In vivo; Positron emission tomography; Molecular imaging; Preclinical imaging; Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine; Nanoparticle; Magnetic resonance imaging; Materials science; Nanomedicine; Biomedical engineering; Computer science; Medical physics; Medicine; Nuclear medicine; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053407,0.001070809,0.001249868,0.001113284,0.0002233759,0.001316838,0.0008903396,0.001474094,0.002474673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005632543,0.0003666243,0.000339132,0.001182712,0.0005910928,0.001962413,0.0005437979,0.001421545,0.001823802],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007046567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008851608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001075065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002563497,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998239,0.00002623863,0.00001600962,0.00004191674,0.00006506274,0.00002701057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996923,0.0001503348,0.00004676512,0.000008719282,0.00007521026,0.00002678643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001907024,0.0002575829,0.0002218399,0.007282216,0.00007884295,0.0003167324,0.00008745182,0.0008392337,0.04001132,0.006024352,0.01649639,0.9281932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005112193,0.0003308103,0.0006037528,0.00120435,0.0001568958,0.001700567,0.00008875019,0.0007424112,0.02038564,0.002708077,0.9719836,0.00004407524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006651196,0.9964231,0.0009823627,0.0002908948,0.0001582079,0.000007790777,0.00001583776,0.00001350393,0.001443081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003336528,0.993071,0.001190099,0.0003035069,0.0001525088,0.00001505441,0.00003388039,0.000004961908,0.001892387],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002474673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008278608,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0209455295766685,"score_gpt":0.3016105461847862,"score_spread":0.2806650166081177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}