{"id":"W2101273362","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01951.x","title":"Effects of ocean acidification on visual risk assessment in coral reef fishes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Functional Ecology","topic":"Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Australian Research Council; Yulgilbar Foundation; Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, Australian Research Council; James Cook University","keywords":"Damselfish; Biology; Coral reef fish; Juvenile; Coral reef; Predation; Ecology; Foraging; Reef; Ocean acidification; Fishery; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004792618,0.00009111485,0.000144492,0.0001557984,0.0000829432,0.000007853315,0.0000652196,0.00008889587,0.0009973387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002407333,0.00007181709,0.00004136534,0.0001612846,0.00007490756,0.0001396984,0.00000550557,0.000159244,0.0001968085],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001536043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006084926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008225288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001036421,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989223,0.0003470595,0.0001988819,0.0001562274,0.0001609241,0.0002145828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983356,0.001335219,0.0001390323,0.00008391943,0.0000338332,0.00007240564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002229758,0.0002105728,0.9919518,0.00001996406,0.00001426067,0.000001512896,0.0000475515,0.001095132,0.0002409591,0.0004230788,0.001068887,0.004703338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003882788,0.000505536,0.9952964,0.000006976799,0.00001269479,0.000004215628,0.00004521755,0.001953331,0.000630249,0.0001751652,0.0009046809,0.0000773174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973149,0.0001023434,0.0001192093,0.0002225686,0.001039225,0.0001969969,0.00002222661,0.00001779421,0.0009647367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.00004403751,0.0001521459,0.0001782991,0.0001752551,0.000002456424,0.0001280346,0.000002746934,0.0001647893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004626021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999159,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00979209289328874,"score_gpt":0.2386180085662235,"score_spread":0.2288259156729348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}