{"id":"W2101318105","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00220.x","title":"DOES RAIDING EXPLAIN THE NEGATIVE RETURNS TO FACULTY SENIORITY?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Seniority; Monopsony; Economics; Productivity; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demographic economics; Quality (philosophy); Labour economics; Political science; Law; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002467056,0.00026082,0.0005642992,0.001213121,0.0009150626,0.001848738,0.001144823,0.001185907,0.01179256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01930854,0.0002182643,0.0006398814,0.001428399,0.001084274,0.001287231,0.001367956,0.001184954,0.001481465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006385613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007697282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01191849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01147199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989718,0.0002094744,0.00008061192,0.0001851854,0.0001431916,0.0004097369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716316,0.007605825,0.01457353,0.002013219,0.0007890367,0.00338676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204971,0.00006860996,0.9870512,0.00001100145,0.00003379019,0.0001205983,0.00022951,0.00029205,0.0001502549,0.0008979787,0.0005943124,0.01043013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001987573,0.00009154677,0.9906538,0.00001715509,0.00004072643,0.0001368496,0.001114753,0.003376164,0.0001874491,0.003384667,0.0009661209,0.0000109854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994532,0.0003235802,0.0006352132,0.001988253,0.00002890055,0.00000951611,0.0001808197,0.00001618294,0.002285495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989198,0.00005749633,0.0001139125,0.0001091338,0.00003702957,0.000002207271,0.00008705431,0.000004188065,0.0006690874],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03945005,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04171776907124301,"score_gpt":0.2775459435351934,"score_spread":0.2358281744639504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}