{"id":"W2101399271","doi":"10.1190/sbgf2013-153","title":"Gravimetric and Magnetic interpretation of Catalão II anomaly (GO-Brazil)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geological and Geophysical Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Ocean Sciences; University of British Columbia; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Gravimetric analysis; Interpretation (philosophy); Anomaly (physics); Computer science; Chemistry; Physics; Condensed matter physics; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003260157,0.00005958404,0.0001094517,0.00003556231,0.00006344782,0.00001276714,0.00005903273,0.00002168597,0.004141002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003519978,0.00003479614,0.00002205309,0.0001929708,0.0000982049,0.00009172744,0.00002283802,0.00003313953,0.0006937271],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":3.151643e-7,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002016514,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006311928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005158763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995719,0.00001440503,0.0001055933,0.0001131652,0.00008226522,0.0001126429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997532,0.0000939728,0.00002517619,0.00004778964,0.00002924793,0.00005055791],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006175432,0.00001652756,0.5154349,0.00001049491,0.000005941274,4.199604e-7,0.00009765303,0.0000235773,0.00003487086,0.00009040734,0.0002884174,0.4839906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006836645,0.0004632304,0.9885961,0.000002174528,0.000005515974,0.00000100231,0.00005278903,0.005078475,0.00006650783,0.005369574,0.0002421544,0.00005406611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9739587,0.0008792127,0.00003465671,0.0003391835,0.00003561534,0.00008675452,0.000004325636,0.00001341165,0.02464818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971393,0.00003287887,0.0003448295,0.0001442471,0.00001169165,9.320579e-7,0.000009244384,4.391628e-7,0.002316436],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4839365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005871031865894855,"score_gpt":0.1777248783862116,"score_spread":0.1718538465203168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}