{"id":"W2101552807","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03021.x","title":"Pore fabric anisotropy: testing the equivalent pore concept using magnetic measurements on synthetic voids of known geometry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anisotropy; Materials science; Composite material; Geometry; Void (composites); Magnetic susceptibility; Optics; Condensed matter physics; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005657619,0.0002167709,0.0001516628,0.0002482763,0.0001613398,0.0001948795,0.0002590636,0.0002120622,0.00031098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001816647,0.0001311936,0.0001157378,0.0001902514,0.0005780074,0.0003799251,0.000248924,0.0002276243,0.00004803984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001570711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008586921,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004790225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004926308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999702,0.00005226279,0.00001764471,0.00006471288,0.0001146169,0.00004864163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980539,0.0009838813,0.0003754361,0.0002799474,0.0002235802,0.00008323597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008107637,0.00002766077,0.001262056,0.00003833551,0.000004265786,0.00004542264,0.00006404476,0.002345746,0.9940206,0.0002888273,0.000009141922,0.001812824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009022987,0.0003209804,0.008925774,0.000004633071,0.000007799634,0.0001772661,0.00007804117,0.0253946,0.9643916,0.0001468846,0.0005309604,0.000012476],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900683,0.00005437167,0.009487538,0.000009745479,0.000003287658,0.000007344237,0.0000374029,0.00003210742,0.0002997606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968455,0.00002567091,0.003030774,0.000001969378,0.000001303539,0.000005035208,0.00003056585,0.000005424622,0.0000535486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0005657619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002992094,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03354868984369753,"score_gpt":0.2666836285180186,"score_spread":0.2331349386743211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}