{"id":"W2101552807","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03021.x","title":"Pore fabric anisotropy: testing the equivalent pore concept using magnetic measurements on synthetic voids of known geometry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geophysical Journal International","topic":"Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anisotropy; Materials science; Composite material; Geometry; Void (composites); Magnetic susceptibility; Optics; Condensed matter physics; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001978534,0.0002220426,0.0002011952,0.00008201782,0.0002174848,0.00006260481,0.0004417775,0.00007727266,0.0001092704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001579082,0.0001639957,0.0001868862,0.0001559633,0.0002334066,0.000009924131,0.0001745992,0.0002213984,0.00001210746],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000328319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006632484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007935845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005510149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982433,0.00009759279,0.0004222077,0.0002779388,0.0006421481,0.0003167547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989886,0.00006368301,0.0002794998,0.0002186972,0.0003810181,0.00006854958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002433692,0.0008776526,0.02765779,0.00003247507,0.0003322529,0.00009789702,0.0001146801,0.005755189,0.9304011,0.001258494,0.006077599,0.02715154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005991797,0.008632015,0.8152535,0.0007015507,0.0005856884,0.002335554,0.0006487422,0.005324316,0.1275555,0.01023309,0.02092956,0.001808685],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925597,0.001423086,0.000894927,0.0004373643,0.0007712108,0.0001322093,0.00004979404,0.000008605152,0.003723043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966084,0.00003747026,0.0009761853,0.0001365907,0.001408822,0.000005188701,0.0000493031,0.00002058641,0.000757433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8028455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6687551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03354868984369753,"score_gpt":0.2666836285180186,"score_spread":0.2331349386743211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}