{"id":"W2101664987","doi":"10.2308/iace.2003.18.1.79","title":"Relevance, Reliability, and the Earnings Quality Debate","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Accounting Education","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Earnings; Foundation (evidence); Reliability (semiconductor); Quality (philosophy); Earnings quality; Accounting; Narrative; Psychology; Positive economics; Engineering ethics; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Engineering; Law; Accrual; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003659665,0.0001996217,0.0002493645,0.0001633781,0.0002805829,0.0005127455,0.0002962357,0.00006692558,0.0001234399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04520035,0.0001667988,0.00004682189,0.0006724286,0.0002009059,0.001368485,0.0001751938,0.0003202254,0.0001866363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007821895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004638162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003629247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002104031,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982823,0.00009127375,0.0004785534,0.0004622425,0.0003583715,0.0003272439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935598,0.0003314064,0.00544295,0.0004425552,0.0002141391,0.000009125913],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004745306,0.0001356548,0.6557012,0.0004020908,0.00001185777,0.000001028129,0.0009953472,0.0002182873,0.00005066021,0.2554169,0.006459735,0.08055979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006102863,0.000001979345,0.215183,0.0001325898,0.00002044555,0.000001312539,0.0008327343,0.0002756278,0.00001883801,0.02627877,0.756408,0.0002364584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360439,0.0006451648,0.002167411,0.00470218,0.0009192216,0.000491282,2.678349e-7,0.0001326153,0.05489803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914434,0.0001394536,0.0007879714,0.002309937,0.000667777,0.00008186264,0.000006831486,0.00003297182,0.004529814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7499483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9628423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009616421573786718,"score_gpt":0.2762702912716342,"score_spread":0.2666538696978475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}