{"id":"W2101790397","doi":"10.1017/s0260210514000217","title":"Arguing with law: strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Framing (construction); Persuasion; International law; Diplomacy; Jurisdiction; Argumentation theory; Universal jurisdiction; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0234328,0.0004738559,0.000809263,0.008715083,0.005606343,0.01963182,0.002129722,0.007955914,0.003040191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02120514,0.000358595,0.0004686335,0.008610243,0.06753678,0.01224952,0.004997948,0.005868133,0.0002707106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008326926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009930884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01023802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9787102,0.01692308,0.0004799789,0.0009529341,0.001943911,0.0009899582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681756,0.02726886,0.002036005,0.0006143138,0.00121419,0.0006909667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009306032,0.0000213335,0.0004580834,0.000282581,0.00001443827,0.0001782823,0.02987831,0.0001532304,0.00005448312,0.9530241,0.003214425,0.0127114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003807106,0.00004158342,0.002925123,0.005852548,0.00004220284,0.0003495368,0.0940514,0.0006048042,0.0002462059,0.6791058,0.2166996,0.0000430881],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08071279,0.3948467,0.004456683,0.1516914,0.0009029754,0.00003166687,0.00003776113,0.00003688492,0.3672832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935068,0.05491345,0.0008198584,0.005839661,0.0005195051,0.00004033176,0.00002202617,0.00001974134,0.00275744],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0234328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423166311405146,"score_gpt":0.3620364136894957,"score_spread":0.3278047505754443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}