{"id":"W2101790397","doi":"10.1017/s0260210514000217","title":"Arguing with law: strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Studies","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Framing (construction); Persuasion; International law; Diplomacy; Jurisdiction; Argumentation theory; Universal jurisdiction; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007453817,0.0001320795,0.0002187407,0.00004510146,0.0004119483,0.0001079363,0.0004241129,0.00002213734,0.0002059255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001582879,0.00007944725,0.00007005128,0.00004103205,0.0005720326,0.0003018927,0.00008332718,0.00009297184,0.00001126565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001063711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005322171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007873773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001776691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998401,0.00009924635,0.0003419027,0.0001948239,0.0008244868,0.0001384859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985548,0.0003007191,0.0002602148,0.00008940859,0.0007572605,0.00003755928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487499,0.00002979749,0.0008013339,0.0001571182,0.0002782543,0.000002100317,0.0006426753,0.000002323403,0.00001785719,0.9968556,0.0009426273,0.0002554802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008034,0.0001911441,0.01860634,0.006680109,0.0003313224,0.00003490044,0.002120514,0.0001604079,0.0002377737,0.1421352,0.828017,0.0004772283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.561585,0.03418218,0.0001187964,0.02030158,0.001505236,0.0006650932,0.0000429707,0.00006917582,0.38153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964086,0.03091308,0.0002710225,0.002604087,0.0005601702,0.00003677109,0.00001889326,0.000009149069,0.001500861],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8547204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3239765,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03423166311405146,"score_gpt":0.3620364136894957,"score_spread":0.3278047505754443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}