{"id":"W2101808175","doi":"10.1139/s08-019","title":"Characterization and environmental evaluation of Atikokan coal fly ash for environmental applications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Coal and Its By-products","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fly ash; Leachate; Environmental science; Coal; Leaching (pedology); Waste management; Calcite; Weathering; Environmental chemistry; Mineralogy; Geology; Soil water; Chemistry; Geochemistry; Soil science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005307694,0.00009530568,0.0001273501,0.00009972652,0.0001745564,0.00001562936,0.0001090066,0.00002672471,0.00008193349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001763204,0.0000834713,0.00002698949,0.0000612873,0.0003273744,0.0004145918,0.0000192145,0.00006706912,0.000002163946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000237304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002535739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002436615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.866595e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989452,0.00001283317,0.0002457677,0.0001673924,0.0004885189,0.0001402482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996155,0.0000332703,0.0001548319,0.00007898865,0.000005460874,0.000111969],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002695956,0.00007237171,0.09785142,0.00001667551,0.00001321638,0.000001329028,0.000379626,0.006374203,0.8198581,0.000006844284,0.000005253089,0.07539403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004157269,0.0002228629,0.9367421,0.000009207051,0.00003165431,0.0001832412,0.0001260197,0.0492284,0.01123846,0.00001012959,0.00168351,0.0001087203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973645,0.0007296756,0.001416471,0.00002744026,0.00009104801,0.0002019122,0.0001384593,0.00000281306,0.00002771624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983141,0.000571414,0.0009156627,0.00001217464,0.00007817816,0.000001920438,0.00004288894,0.000003084476,0.00006058606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8388907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3403861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01209695418386362,"score_gpt":0.1794526234000403,"score_spread":0.1673556692161767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}